Algebraic Geometry SeminarMondays 3:00--3:50 PM
|
![]() |
Related seminars:
All Mathematics Seminars |
| Date | Speaker | Title (click for abstract) |
|---|---|---|
| 9/1/08 | Frank Sottile, TAMU | Toric polar Cremona transformations |
| 9/8/08 | Zach Teitler, TAMU | Computing asymptotic multiplier ideals |
| 9/15/08 | Chris Hillar, TAMU | Positive semidefinite matrix word equations |
| 9/22/08 | Jarek Buczynski, TAMU | Maps between toric varieties in terms of Cox coordinates |
| 9/29/08 | Paulo Lima-Filho, TAMU | Invariants for real curves |
| 10/6/08 | Javier Elizondo, UNAM | Equivariant cohomology of real toric varieties |
| 10/13/08 | Christine Berkesch, Purdue | The rank of a hypergeometric system |
| 10/20/08 | David Jorgensen, UT-Arlington | Dualizing complexes old and new |
| 10/27/08 | Jeremy Martin, U Kansas | Counting simplicial and cubical spanning trees |
| 11/3/08 | Zhenhua Qu, UT Austin | Tropical Compactifications |
| 11/10/08 | Mara Neusel, Texas Tech | Degree bounds in invariant theory |
| 11/17/08 | Ashraf Ibrahim, TAMU | Roots of Polynomials over Local Fields |
| 11/24/08 | Sarah Kitchen, U. Utah | Representation Theory and the Geometry of Flag Varieties |
| 12/1/08 | Frank Sottile, TAMU | Frontiers of Reality in Schubert Calculus |
Garcia and Sottile showed that problem of classifying toric patches that posses linear precision is equivalent to a classifying homogeneous polynomials whose toric derivatives (which generate its toric polar linear system) define a Cremona transformation (a birational isomorphism).
In this talk, I will explain the motivation
from geometric modelling and then outline the
classification of forms F in three variables
whose toric derivatives define a Cremona
transformation, which solves an open question
in geometric modeling. This is joint work with
Kristian Ranestad and Hans-Christian Graf
von Bothmer.
TOP
Most of the celebrated applications of multiplier ideals in algebraic geometry, such as the invariance of plurigenera and existence of flips, have actually involved asymptotic multiplier ideals. However virtually no examples of asymptotic multiplier ideals have actually been computed. In contrast to the case of ordinary multiplier ideals, whose definition is an explicit---but very difficult---algorithm for computing them, there is no apparent algorithm for computing asymptotic multiplier ideals.
I will give an expository introduction to
asymptotic multiplier ideals, including
the applications that have made
them important tools in algebraic geometry,
and the relation to the analytic approach (involving
approximation of plurisubharmonic forms).
I will describe some cases in which asymptotic
multiplier ideals have now been computed.
This is work in progress.
I will mention some open questions.
TOP
Matrix word equations arise naturally in many contexts. In the
simplest incarnation, one is given a word W(X,B), matrices B and P, and a
solution matrix X is desired such that W(X,B) = P. In many applications,
people are interested in equations in which B, P, and X are resetricted to
be positive semidefinite matrices (of the same size). For instance, one
might desire positive semidefinite solutions X to the ubiquitous Riccati
equation XBX = P given fixed B and P. In this talk, we will give an
overview of what is known about such equations in real algebraic geometry.
In particular, we will discuss the very general result (of which there are
now two proofs) that positive semidefinite word equations W(X,B) = P
always have (generically finite) positive semidefinite solutions when W is
palindromic (an unavoidable restriction). This result was motivated by
the long-standing BMV conjecture in statistical physics. (partly joint
with C. R. Johnson and separately, S. Armstrong).
TOP
Toric varieties are algebraic varieties,
which admit an action of a torus (C^*)^n,
such that this action has an open orbit.
Cox observed that by analogy to affine and projective spaces,
any toric variety can be understood in terms of its homogeneous
coordinate ring, which is always a polynomial ring.
This is a very convenient tool for computational purposes,
especially if you are interested in subvarieties of toric varieties.
We propose an elementary way of describing any map between any two toric varieties in terms of Cox coordinates, which fills in a gap left by Cox.
(This is joint work with Gavin Brown.)
TOP
This is a very elementary talk in which we present explicit computations
of certain bigraded equivariant cohomology rings of real algebraic curves.
We will first give a gentle introduction to the theory and present the
computations.
At the end, we will explain how these invariants relate to other invariants,
from classical objects such as Brauer groups to recent versions of Deligne
cohomology for real curves.
This culminates with a new proof of Weichold's classical description of
the Picard group of a real curve.
TOP
In this talk we overview a work in progress on the equivariant cohomology
of real toric structures (RTS). We will introduce RTS and give a couple of
examples of them, and we also introduce the Borel equivariant cohomology.
At the end we want to show the computations we have in equivariant
cohomology for RTS.
TOP
An A-hypergeometric system is a parametric system of PDE arising from
a toric ideal. The dimension of its solution space, called its rank,
is constant for generic parameters. I will discuss the combinatorial
nature of its rank at non-generic parameters.
No background is necessary; it may be helpful to have a basic
understanding of semigroup rings.
TOP
In this talk we will give a brief history of dualizing complexes,
and their more concrete manifestations, dualizing modules.
We will then introduce semi-dualizing modules, and discuss
existence questions for them in the Cohen-Macaulay context.
TOP
The classical matrix-tree theorem expresses the number of
spanning trees of a graph G in terms of the eigenvalues of its Laplacian
matrix; one well-known special case is Cayley's formula n^{n-2} in the
case that G is the complete graph on n vertices. Based on work of Gil
Kalai, we extend the definition of spanning tree from graphs to
CW-complexes in such a way that the matrix-tree theorem remains valid.
As an application, we enumerate the simplicial spanning trees of any
shifted simplicial complex X by their facet-vertex degree sequences, by
finding a combinatorial interpretation for the eigenvalues of a certain
weighted Laplacian. We also have obtained some results on cubical
complexes that generalize the formula for the number of spanning trees of
a hypercube graph.
TOP
Tropical compactification is defined and studied by Tevelev
originally in an effort of compactifying moduli spaces of del Pezzo
surfaces. I will talk about this method and some new results on tropical
compactification and sketch how it is applied to the study of
compactification of moduli spaces of line arrangements in projective
plane. As we shall see, this involves algebraic geometry on one side and
combinatorics on the other. (joint with Mark Luxton)
TOP
In this talk I want to give a survey on invariant theory of finite groups.
For that I have picked the particular problem of degree bounds:
what are they, why are they relevant, how do we find them,
and what are current results and open problems?
are the things I want to cover.
TOP
Let K be a p-adic field and f be a univariate polynomial
with coefficients in K and non-vanishing discriminant.
In this talk, we are going to present an algorithmic
method for counting the number of roots of f in K.
This method is based on a result connecting the number
of roots of f with the number of roots of its reduction
modulo some ideal.
The connection with so called lower binomials will also
be discussed.
TOP
The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem identifies finite dimensional
representations for a complex semi-simple algebraic group
with line bundles on a projective variety associated to
that group.
I will discuss generalizations of this principle of associating
representations to sheaves.
In particular, the structure of a representation will give
the associated sheaf the structure of a D-module.
We aim to understand representations by relating D-modules
on various partial flag varieties associated to our group.
I will begin with a brief overview of D-modules and equivariant
sheaves, highlighting some advantageous differences from
O-modules on projective varieties, then explain how to extend
known results relating representations and sheaves on the full
flag variety to improve our understanding of the geometric
picture.
TOP
For more information, email Zach Teitler.