| |
Date Time |
Location | Speaker |
Title – click for abstract |
 |
01/31 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Peter Pivovarov Texas A&M University |
Small-ball probabilities for the volume of random convex sets
The focus of the talk will be distributional inequalities for the
volume of random convex sets. Typical models include convex hulls and
Minkowski sums of line segments generated by independent random
points. I will outline an approach to small-deviation estimates that
makes use of rearrangement inequalities and tools from classical
convexity such as intrinsic volumes and natural generalizations.
(joint work with Grigoris Paouris) |
 |
02/07 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Grigoris Paouris Texas A&M University |
The isotropic position and the reverse Santalo inequality.
I will present proofs of the reverse Santalo inequality, the
existence of M-position and the reverse Brunn-Minkowski inequality, using
purely convex geometric tools. The approach is based on properties of the
isotropic position. This is a joint work with A. Giannopoulos and B-H.
Vritsou. |
 |
02/28 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Gideon Schechtman Weizmann Institute |
A quantitative version of the commutator theorem for zero trace matrices
As is well known, a complex $m\times m$ matrix $A$ is a commutator (i.e., there are matrices $B$ and $C$ of the same dimensions as $A$ such that $A=[B,C]=BC-CB$) if and only if $A$ has zero trace. In such a situation clearly $\|A\|\le 2\|B\|\|C\|$ where $\|D\|$ denotes the norm of $D$ as an operator from $\ell_2^m$ to itself.
Does the converse hold? That is, if $A$ has zero trace are there $m\times m$ matrices $B$ and $C$ such that $A=[B,C]$ and $\|B\|\|C\|\le K\|A\|$ for some absolute constant $K$? If not, what is the behavior of the best $K$ as a function of $m$?
I'll present some new insight, due to Johnson, Ozawa and myself concerning this question. |
 |
03/27 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Haskell Rosenthal University of Texas at Austin |
A new direction in classical harmonic analysis with applications to the hyperinvariant subspace problem. |
 |
04/03 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Gilles Pisier Texas A&M University |
Cotype of projective tensor products of Lp. |
 |
04/10 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Rostislav Grigorchuk Texas A&M University |
Bounded cohomology and amenability criterion for Beirling Banach algebras
Bounded cohomology (or what is the same cohomology of Banach algebras) were introduced by Barri Johnson and for abstract groups and topological spaces by M.Gromov.
I will present some results concerning bounded cohomology of a free group, weights on groups and Tychonoff groups (the notion due to Furstenberg), and will finish with a criterion of amenability of Beurling Banach algebras, which are a generalization of l^1-group algebra. Some open problems will be mention. |
 |
04/17 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Tomek Szankowski Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem |
Trace formula in Banach spaces
We investigate the question when does the trace formula:
tr(T)=\sum\lambda_j(T) hold.
Here \lambda_1(T),\lambda_2(T),... are all the eigenvalues of
an operator T, with their
multiplicities.
Lidskii in 1957 proved that the formula holds for the Hilbert space.
In the 1970's it was realized that the formula only can hold for spaces
which are very close to the Hilbert space.
Pisier in 1988 proved that the weak Hilbert spaces satisfy the formula.
The weak Hilbert spaces are somewhat elusive and there are very few known
examples of them.
Bill Johnson and I have recently found a rather large clas of natural
Banach spaces which satisfy the formula. The crucial role (like in
Pisier's proof) is played by the quantity:
G_n(X)= \sup{|det[<\phi_i,
x_j>]^n_{i, j = 1}|: \phi_i \in
B_{X*},x_j \in B_X}. |
 |
04/24 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Ted Odell University of Texas at Austin |
Spreading Models and other asymptotic structures in Banach spaces
We will define and review known results about
the above and present some new results as well. |
 |
05/01 5:00pm |
MILN 216 |
Thomas Schlumprecht Texas A&M University |
Embedding Banach spaces into spaces with a coordinate system
We plan to give an overview of results addressing the following type of problems: Given a Banach space X, we want to embed X into a Banach space Z which has some coordinate system with certain properties but is as close as possible to X. |
There will be no seminar on Mar 6, Mar 20 (due to Group, Geometry
and Random Structures workshop), and Apr 24 (due to Maxson lectures).