MATH 425, spring 2015
Course information
- Instructor: Dr G.Berkolaiko, office: Blocker 625c,
email: berko AT math.tamu.edu
- No office phone: budget cuts
- Lectures: MWF 9:10-10, BLOC 164
- Office hours: MWF 10:10-11:00 (subject to availability);
other times by appointment.
- Course description (first day handout)
- Homework and exam grades on eCampus.
- FAQ
Extras
- Get Matlab (free for Texas A&M Students) or Octave (open-source analogue of Matlab)
- Matlab
programs from the book's author.
- Some websites with relevant quotes:
- Other resources:
- Matlab demonstrations:
Homework
Exercise with stars next to them are compulsory for honors students.
- Submit Wed, Jan 28:
- (*) Plot prices of SPX call options around the money (20 data
points) for 3 different expirations on the same plot.
- In class we compared PNL diagrams for 3 long calls
(95C@5.50, 100C@2.70, 105C@1.15). Draw PNL diagrams for:
- short 95C@5.50, 100C@2.70, 105C@1.15
- long 95P@1.55, 100P@3.70, 105P@7.10
- short 95P@1.55, 100P@3.70, 105P@7.10
(draw 3 figures with 3 curves on each).
- From the book: exercises 1.1, 1.3, P1.2 (from pages 7, 8
and 9 correspondingly).
- Submit Wed, Feb 11:
- Argue that it is never profitable to exercise an American
call early. Therefore, its value is identical to that of a
European call.
- Prove that the call price \(C_t(E,T)\) is a decreasing function of
the strike price \(E\).
- (*) Prove that the call price \(C_t(E,T)\) is a convex function
of the strike price \(E\), i.e.
$$C(E) \leq \alpha_1 C(E_1) + \alpha_2 C(E_2),$$
where \(E = \alpha_1 E_1 + \alpha_2 E_2\) and \(\alpha_1 +
\alpha_2=1\). (Hint: consider first \(\alpha_1 = \frac12\) and price a
butterfly).
- From the book: 2.3, 2.4. 2.5
- Find out why prices
for E-mini
S&P 500 Futures on CME do not follow the formula we
derived for futures,
\[F(t) = S(0) e^{r(T-t)}.\]
- Find the arithmetical errors in
this example of
the dichotomy model. Why does the correct answer dealer's profit
makes perfect sense (and therefore the erroneous answer makes no
sense)?
- You assumed the dichotomy model, priced and sold a call
with strike \(E\), \(S_d < E < S_u\), followed the hedging
procedure but the market ended up at \(S_1\), \[ S_d \le S_1
\le S_u. \] Did you lose or make money?
- (*) Assume the dichotomy model with \(r=0\) and \(S_d < S_0
< S_u\) and plot the call price
\[ C = (S_0 - S_d) \frac{S_u - E}{S_u - S_d} \]
for a range of strike prices \(E\) that starts below \(S_d\)
and ends above \(S_u\). Observe that our call price violates
the bound we derived earlier
\[ C \geq \max(S_0-E, 0). \]
This suggests the above formula is not valid for \(E < S_d\)
or \(E > S_u\). Derive the appropriate formulas for the call
prices in these ranges of \(E\).
- Show that
\[ f(x,t) = \frac1{\sqrt{2\pi t}} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2t}} \]
satisfies the heat equation \(f_t = \frac12 f_{xx}\).
- From the book: 3.4, 3.6, 3.7 (may use the differentiation
trick), 3.8; P3.2
- Submit Wed, Feb 25:
- From the book: 4.1, 4.3, 4.2, 4.4, P4.1 (Hint: in 4.2 you
need to derive the denisty of a transformed random variable,
see,
e.g. Wiki).
- Redo the Matlab
analysis ch05_add.m we did for chap 5
with prices from the stock (or index) of your choice. Submit
the figure; make sure to include in the figure the stock
symbol and the dates for which the data was gathered.
- From the book: 6.1, 6.2 (calculate (6.5) and (6.6) in the
circumstances specified; ignore 3rd and 4th moments), 6.5*,
6.10, and P6.2.
- Submit Wed, Mar 11:
- Calculate \(\mathbb{E} \left[ \left(W_{t+\delta t} - W_t
\right)^2\right]\), \(\mathrm{var} \left[\left(W_{t+\delta t} - W_t
\right)^2\right]\); 7.2
- 8.2, 8.3, 8.8*, 8.10, 8.11 (use the result of 8.10, not
8.7), P8.1
- Derive the expressions for \(\rho\) and vega; 10.4,
10.6
- Check (by calculating derivatives) that
$$ V(t,S) = e^{-r(T-t)} N(d_2) $$
satisfies the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE. Show (without calculating
derivatives) that
$$ V(t, S) = S N(d_1) $$
also satisfies Black-Scholes-Merton PDE (see Chap. 17 for help).
- Submit Wed, Apr 8:
- Calculate value of a Euro call with a knockout barrier using
binomial tree with 3 levels:
S0=100, u=1.1, d=0.9, r=0.02, dt=1/12, E=85, barrier=82.
- (*) For the American Call computation via the tree model,
prove that at every node the immediate excercise profit is
less or equal than the computed option value.
- Submit Fri, Apr 24:
- For the American Put with the parameters S0=100, E=120,
r=0.05, expiration in 3 months, use the tree model with dt =
1/12, u=1.1, d=0.9. Calculate the option price and deltas.
Generate two random paths through the tree and describe hedging
procedure and results.
- Read Sec 16.2, do exercise 16.6
- Read Sec 16.3, do exercise 16.2
- 12.2
- Show that the change of variables \(\ln F - \tau/2 = z\)
converts the equation
\[ \frac{\partial Q}{\partial \tau}
= \frac12 F^2 \frac{\partial^2 Q}{\partial F^2}\]
into the heat equation
\[ \frac{\partial H}{\partial \tau}
= \frac12 \frac{\partial^2 H}{\partial z^2}. \]
- Submit Fri, May 1: Matlab mini-project: (10
homework-equivalent points)
On Aug 7, 2014
the stock AAPL closed at 94.48. At this time, the call with strike 94
and expiration 8/29 was traded at 2.425 (midprice). Assume the rate
is 0.0015.
- What's the implied volatility? Corresponding delta?
- Simulate delta-hedging with daily close prices and above
volatility (download daily close prices from Yahoo Finance).
- Calculate the volatility realized by these historical prices.
- Does hedging work better or worse with realized volatility?
Other Announcements
Welcome! |
Welcome to Math 425. Course news will be posted here. |
1 Jan 2015 |
|
This file was last modified on Wednesday, 10-Jan-2024 15:58:23 CST.