(c) copyright Foundation Coalition (S. A. Fulling) 1997

Classes 1.2, 2.1, 2.M

Functions

Reading assignment for Friday, September 5

Reading assignment for Wednesday, September 10

Reading assignment for Thursday, September 11


On Friday (class 1.2) we continue exploring Maple, with emphasis on the distinction between "functions" and "expressions" in Maple syntax. At the same time we'll review some mathematical functions that are (for the most part) already familiar to you, before discussing exactly what the word "function" means. These include the absolute value function, linear functions, power functions, sine and cosine, exponentials, and logarithms. They provide the raw material for all the examples and problems in the rest of calculus. Also, some of them will be put to work in your engineering course this week.

On the following Wednesday (class 2.1) we make a deeper analysis of the function concept.


Exponential and logarithmic functions

In the list of elementary functions, the ones that you are least likely to have studied in depth in high school are the exponentials and logarithms. Stewart also has very little to say about them at this stage. Some understanding of them is necessary, however, for your work in engineering class on graphing of quantitative relationships. We will study these functions in detail next semester (see Stewart, Chapter 6). Today we just mention a few basic facts about them and help you get acquainted with their qualitative behavior (what their graphs look like).

[READ US!]


Functions in applications

So far we have thought of a function as represented by a formula, such as y = 3x + 2. The main point of class 2.1 is that a function is not the same thing as a formula, and in fact most functions do not have formulas corresponding to them.

In order to search for a proper definition of "function", let's contemplate some examples of the functions that arise in engineering and other subjects that apply calculus.

  1. The position of a falling body, as a function of time. You may know from high-school science, and will certainly hear in physics class very soon, that when an object is dropped from rest, the distance it travels is

    x = 1/2 g t2

    as a function of time. In this case the function is indeed given by a formula.

  2. The temperature in our classroom, as a function of time. At any time t, we can read a thermometer in the room and get a number; we can plot these numbers on a graph. If the thermostat doesn't work very well, the numbers will not be constant, and the graph will be some random curve.

    This is the graph of a temperature function, T = g(t). Ordinarily we would not expect to have an exact algebraic formula for this function; it is simply empirical data. (In fact, in practice the situation is usually even worse than this: The temperature will be measured only at some finite set of times, and there will be some error (meaning unavoidable experimental inaccuracy, not a human blunder) in each data point.

    We idealize the situation and have faith that there is some well-defined "true" temperature function to which the thermometer readings are an approximation. However shaky this stance may be philosophically, it is a tremendously powerful point of view for describing and partially controlling the world we live in, through science and engineering.) If we are very lucky (for instance, if we do have a good thermostat), we may be able to come up with a theoretical formula that predicts the temperature g(t) well, such as

    T = 75 - 5 exp (-t/10).

    For practice,

  3. The interest rate paid by a bank, as a function of time (date). Usually a bank will not change its rate more often than once a day, so the graph of this function is really just a string of points, one for each day. We could think of the interest as a piecewise-constant function of time measured in seconds (similar to the cost of mailing a letter or making a long-distance telephone call -- see Stewart, Example 15, pp. 9-10). On a longer time scale, however, it is possible to idealize the situation by filling in a smooth curve through the points.

    Economists can now do calculus with this function, pretending that the interest rate varies continuously with time like the temperature in the room. It is useful to deal with interest rates in this way, even though in this case the smooth curve through the data points is not just philosophically shaky, but downright fictitious!

These examples show that, in "real life", a function is most likely to be encountered as either

  1. a list of numbers, or
  2. a graph,
rather than a formula. Either of these kinds of concrete experiences forms the basis for an abstract definition of the term "function".

So, what is a function?

Let us look at some ways that various people have tried to answer this question.

What all these definitions are trying to say is that a function is some kind of imaginary machine that processes each number x (the input) into a number y = f(x) (the output).

This is our primary notion of function.

In summary, there are two equivalent concepts of "function":

  1. An abstract machine for processing numbers (or other entities).
  2. A graph that passes the vertical line test.
A function is such a fundamental concept of mathematics that it is not surprising that we have trouble giving a crisp definition of it in terms of more elementary concepts. Instead, we form an intuitive concept of function and later define other mathematical words in terms of it.

Be prepared for class exercises on