March 26, 1996 Key to Exam 2Math 312
Using separation of variables, we look for solutions of the form u= XT, where X is a function of x only and T is a function of t only. This leads to the pair of equations:
![]()
Thus,
. Forcing X to satisfy the boundary conditions (2) and (3), leads to the equations:
![]()
Solving the first equation for b in terms of a, we are lead to the equation
. If either
or a is zero, we get that X is also zero. Thus, the only way we can get a nontrivial solution to this problem is for
, or
.
The separated solutions are
![]()
where the
are the solutions to the eigenvalue equation in part (a).
I would look for a solution of the form. Since the partial differential equation and the boundary conditions are homogeneous, we can expect that u(x,t) will also satisfy the partial differential equation as well as the boundary conditions. Thus, we only have to pick the
so that u satisfies the initial condition. Set
. Since the differential operator
, with the homogeneous boundary conditions is ``self adjoint'', we know that eigenfunctions associated with different eigenvalues are orthogonal, and that the set of these eigenfunctions is complete. Thus, we know that we can pick the
so that u satisfies the initial condition and
![]()
along with the initial condition (4).
Notice that the partial differential equation and the boundary conditions are nonhomogeneous. These terms, though, are independent of t. Thus, subtract from the desired soluton u that steady state solution of the partial differential equation which also satisfies the boundary conditions. If v is this function, then
![]()
Setting w=u-v, we see that w satisfies equations (1) through (3) and equation (4) is now w(x,0)=1-v(x). Solve for w as we did above, and then add v to w to get u.
where the boundary condition is in polar coordinates.
We first note that the partial differential equation in nonhomogeneous. Thus, let's look for a simple solution to the nonhomogeous PDE. Seeing that the nonhomogeneity is a function of y alone, leads to setting. Then
. Set w = u - v. Then w satisfies Laplace's equation. Separated solutions to Laplace's equation in polar coordinates which remain bounded at the origin are of the form
,
. Thus, we look for a solution to this problem of the form:
![]()
Setting r=2, we see that the terms
and
are the Fourier series coefficients of the function
. Solve for these terms in the usual manner, and then set u =w+v.
Using separation of variables on the differential equation, we see that separated solutions are of the form:
If the
are to satisfy the boundary conditions for all values of
t we must have a = 0 and
must be an integer multiple
of
. Thus, we look for a solution of form
The unknowns
and
are determined from the two initial
conditions. Thus, we have:
Both of these equations are Fourier sine series expansions, and are solved for the unknown coefficients in the usual manner.
, to show that
there is only one solution to the following problem:
Suppose that the above problem has two solutions,and
. Set
. Then w satisfies the wave equation with homogeneous boundary conditions and zero intitial conditions.
![]()
The two integral terms cancel each other. Since w is zero for x=0 and x=1 this implies that
is also zero for x=0 and x=1. Thus, the term
when evaluated at the endpoints 1 and 0 is zero. Thus, the derivative of E is zero, and E is constant, and we have E(t) = E(0). However, if we have zero initial data as we do for our function w, then 0=E(0)=E(t) for all t. Thus, we must have
for all values of x and t. This means that w is constant, but w is zero when t= 0, thus, w is identically zero. This of course implies that
.