I am submitting my contribution, as a PDF file, "Discrepancy 
between power radiated and the power loss due to radiation 
reaction for an accelerated charge," for Symmetry.  I am writing 
its abstract here in text.  I have just now put it also on 
arXiv:2009.04774.

The abstract is:

We examine here the discrepancy between the radiated power, 
calculated from the Poynting flux at infinity, and the power loss 
due to radiation reaction for an accelerated charge. It is 
emphasized that one needs to maintain a clear distinction between 
the electromagnetic power received by a set of far-off observers 
and the instantaneous mechanical power loss of the charge. In 
literature both quantities are treated as not only equal but 
almost synonymous, however, the two, in general, need not be so. 
It is shown that in the case of a periodic motion, the two 
formulations do yield the same result for the power loss in a 
time averaged sense, though, the instantaneous rates could be 
quite different. It is demonstrated that the difference in the 
two power formulas is  nothing but the difference in the rate of 
change of energy in self-fields of the charge between the 
retarded and  present times. In particular, in the case of a 
uniformly accelerated charge, power going into the self-fields at 
the present time is equal to the power that was going into the 
self-fields at the retarded time plus the power going in 
acceleration fields, usually called radiation. From a comparison 
of far fields with the instantaneous position of the uniformly 
accelerated charge, it is shown that all its fields, including 
the acceleration fields, remain around the charge and are not 
{\em radiated away} from it.

Ashok

--------------------------------------------------------

EDITOR'S NOTE:  As usual, I have lightly edited Ashok's e-mail to 
me to make the format suitable for the list.  I encourage all to 
read the preprint at arXiv:2009.04774.