COALITION MATH 151, FALL 1997 Group II (S. A. Fulling, assisted by Cary Lasher) Day 13.1 Double integrals and Green's theorem (postponed from previous week) 1. Quick remarks on definition (partition of a rectangle into small rectangles to produce a Riemann sum). 2. Interpretations and applications A. Volume (of a certain type of 3-dim region) B. Total mass (or cost, etc) of a plate with varying density. (Mass of a 3-dim object will require a triple integral.) In particular, if the density is 1, the double integral is the area of the 2-dim region; this is of interest when the region is more complicated than a rectangle. C. Flux of a vector field through a surface (brief mention). This uses the perpendicular part of the field as the line integral uses the parallel part. D. Green's theorem -- the main reason for bringing up double integrals at this point: 3. Green's theorem: Evaluate a line integral around a closed path (simple, counterclockwise, no singularities of the field inside). Call the interior region D. A. We know that the integral is zero if d{F_y}/dx - d{F_x}/dy = 0. B. Generalization: The line integral equals the double integral over D of d{F_y}/dx - d{F_x}/dy. (Next semester, when we study the vector cross product, it will be explained why your instructor gives himself the "Gig'em Aggies" sign to remember which term gets the minus sign.) C. Special case: Find a vector field F for which d{F_y}/dx - d{F_x}/dy = 1. (There is more than one such F.) Then the line integral equals the area of the region! This enables you to complete your lab assignment on the area of Texas. 4. Evaluation of double integrals as iterated integrals. (This will continue through the next day.) A. Think of slicing the 2-dim region into strips. This is just like finding areas, except generalized to integrands not equal to 1 (yielding mass, volume, etc.). B. Show rectangular example. C. Activity: Another rectangular example, Stewart 13.2.15 (ed. 3). Do both ways. GOT THIS FAR ON 13.1, LEAVING THE PRESENTATION TO DAY 13.2. THE CLASS AND I AGREED THAT VERTICAL SLICING SUFFICED, AND WE PROCEEDED TO THE NEXT ACTIVITY. D. Activity: A nonrectangular case, Stewart 13.3.7. Individual brainstorming followed by team solution. Hope to get both horizontal and vertical solutions. THIS EXAMPLE TURNS OUT TO BE TOO SYMMETRICAL FOR THE HORIZONTAL SOLUTION TO BE INSTRUCTIVE. STUDENTS FOUND THE VERTICAL CALCULATION EASY. E. Activity: A demonstration of Green's theorem, Stewart 14.4.3. Every team should do both ways. LEFT PRESENTATION FOR DAY 14.1.