Record of daily activities and homework, Math 618, Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable II, Spring 2004

Wednesday, January 21
We worked on an exercise on the definition of infinite products.
Homework for Friday: Read section 8.1, pages 255-263.
Friday, January 23
We discussed the Weierstrass factorization theorem and the representation of the sine function as an infinite product.
Homework for Monday: Read section 8.2, pages 263-266, and do exercises 13 and 14 on page 276 (Chapter 8).
Monday, January 26
We discussed the extension to arbitrary planar domains of the Weierstrass theorem about the existence of holomorphic functions with prescribed zeroes.
Homework for Wednesday: Read the first part of section 8.3, pages 266-270, and do exercises 10 and 21 on pages 276-277 (Chapter 8).
Wednesday, January 28
We discussed (i) variations on the proof of the Weierstrass theorem and (ii) formulas for stereographic projection and the spherical distance.
Homework for Friday: Read the rest of section 8.3, pages 271-274. Do the first problem on the complex analysis qualifying examination from January 2004: namely, show that the images under stereographic projection of two non-zero complex numbers z and w are diametrically opposite points of the sphere if and only if the product of z and the conjugate of w equals -1.
Friday, January 30
We worked on an exercise about unifying the Weierstrass and Mittag-Leffler theorems.
Homework for Monday: Do exercise 20 on page 277 (Chapter 8), write up part 3 of the above handout, and read the beginning of section 9.1, pages 279-281.
Monday, February 2
We worked on an exercise on Jensen's formula.
Homework for Wednesday: Read the remainder of section 9.1. Each group will prepare a derivation of the Poisson-Jensen formula (exercises 1 and 2 on page 296 of Chapter 9).
Wednesday, February 4
We discussed the Poisson-Jensen formula and its application in the theory of entire functions.
Homework for Friday: Read the first part of section 9.3, pages 288-290. Do exercise 8 on page 296 (Chapter 9) and problem 9 on the complex analysis qualifying examination from January 2004.
Friday, February 6
We discussed the notion of order for entire functions and the Hadamard factorization theorem for entire functions of finite order.
Homework for Monday: Finish reading section 9.3 and do exercises 3 and 10 on pages 296-297 (Chapter 9).
Monday, February 9
We discussed Hadamard's factorization theorem for entire functions: the genus μ and the order λ are related by the double inequality μ ≤ λ ≤ μ+1.
Homework for Wednesday: Complete the proof of Hadamard's factorization theorem by proving the second half of the inequality (which is exercise 12 on page 297).
Wednesday, February 11
We looked at the proof that the order of a canonical product equals the convergence exponent of the zeroes; a version of the Weierstrass and Mittag-Leffler theorems with essential singularities; and Runge's approximation theorem.
Homework for Friday: Read section 12.1, pages 361-367, and do exercise 6 on page 380 (Chapter 12).
Friday, February 13
We worked on an exercise on Runge's theorem.
Homework: One group will prepare a presentation for Monday on the Hadamard gap theorem (section 9.2), and the other group will prepare a presentation for Wednesday on Mergelyan's theorem (section 12.2).
Monday, February 16
We discussed the statement and the proof of Hadamard's gap theorem.
Homework for Wednesday: The first group will find an example of a gap series that has the unit circle as natural boundary and whose derivatives of all orders extend continuously to the closed unit disc; the second group will complete the preparation of a presentation on Mergelyan's theorem.
Wednesday, February 18
We discussed the proof of Mergelyan's theorem on polynomial approximation.
Homework for Friday: Read section 12.3, pages 376-379, and do exercise 11 on page 380 (Chapter 12).
Friday, February 20
We worked on an exercise on Swiss cheese.
Homework for Monday: (1) show that the analytic capacity of a line segment is one-quarter of its length; (2) show that the analytic capacity of the arc of the unit circle from angle -φ to angle φ equals sin(φ/2) when 0<φ<π.
Monday, February 23
We worked on an exercise on univalent functions.
Homework for Wednesday: Read section 13.1, pages 383-390, and solve the following exercise. Extract from the proof on page 385 that the map z+z-1 maps the region {z: |z|>r>1} onto the exterior of an ellipse (depending on r). Deduce that the analytic capacity of the ellipse (x/a)2+(y/b)2=1 is (a+b)/2.
Wednesday, February 25
We discussed proofs of the area theorem and of the estimate for the second coefficient of a normalized schlicht function in the unit disc.
Homework for Friday: Do exercises 9 and 10 on page 411 (Chapter 13).
Friday, February 27
We showed several ways that the class of normalized schlicht functions in the unit disc is a normal family: by using the Koebe one-quarter theorem, by using the coefficient estimates from the Bieberbach conjecture (the de Branges theorem), and by using the sharp growth estimate |z|/(1+|z|)2 ≤ |f(z)| ≤ |z|/(1-|z|)2.
Homework for Monday: Read sections 10.1 and 10.2, pages 299-307.
Monday, March 1
We discussed methods for analytic continuation.
Homework for Wednesday: Read sections 10.3 and 10.4, pages 307-314.
Wednesday, March 3
We discussed the monodromy theorem and the idea behind the construction of the modular function using the reflection principle.
Homework for Friday: one group will prepare a presentation on the modular function (Theorem 10.5.4), and the other group will prepare a presentation on the proof of Picard's little theorem via the modular function and the monodromy theorem (Theorem 10.5.5).
Friday, March 5
We discussed the congruence subgroup of the modular group, its fundamental domain, and the construction of the modular function that is invariant under the action of the congruence subgroup.
Homework for Monday: Work the exercise on the modular group handed out in class.
Monday, March 8
We discussed the proof of Picard's little theorem via the modular function and the monodromy theorem.
Homework for Wednesday: do the exercise on Picard's theorems.
Wednesday, March 10
We discussed homework problems about Picard's theorem and the modular group.
Homework for Friday: Read section 13.2, pages 390-398, about the boundary behavior of conformal maps.
Friday, March 12
We discussed two examples that answer questions posed in class last time: (1) a transcendental entire function whose modulus tends to infinity along every ray starting at the origin; (2) a transcendental entire function that tends to zero along every ray starting at the origin.
There is no homework assignment over spring break.
Monday, March 22
We discussed properties equivalent to simple connectivity in the plane.
Homework for Wednesday: Read sections 11.1 and 11.2, pages 335-342.
Wednesday, March 24
We worked on an exercise on simple connectivity.
Homework for Friday: Read sections 11.3 and 11.4, pages 343-349, and do exercises 4 and 5 on page 352.
Friday, March 26
We discussed the homology version of Cauchy's integral formula and the connection between homotopy and homology.
Homework for Monday: Read section 11.5, pages 349-352, and do exercise 31 on page 358.
Monday, March 29
We discussed three definitions of the Γ function and some properties of the function.
Homework for Wednesday: Read section 15.1, pages 447-455.
Wednesday, March 31
We worked on the identity relating the Γ function to the sine function and the duplication formula for the Γ function (Exercises 2 and 3 on page 465 in the textbook).
Homework for Friday: Read the beginning of section 15.2, pages 455-459, and do the following problem. Prove that Γ(z) - ∑n≥0 (-1)n/(n!(z+n)) = ∫1 tz-1 e -t dt.
Friday, April 2
We discussed an integral representation for the Γ function via integration over the Hankel contour.
Homework for Monday: Read the rest of section 15.2, pages 460-464. Prove by a residue calculation that when k is an integer, the integral over the Hankel contour of tz-1/(et-1) is: (a) zero when k  is an integer greater than 1; (b) 2πi when k is 1; (c) non-zero when k is 0; (d) zero when k is a negative even integer. (The integral is not zero when k is a negative odd integer, but you do not need to prove that.)
Monday, April 5
We discussed an integral representation for the ζ function, the functional equation for the ζ function, the trivial zeroes of the ζ function, and the values of the ζ function at the positive even integers.
Homework for Wednesday: Prove that the function ξ(z) defined by z(z-1)π-z/2ζ(z)Γ(z/2) is entire and satisfies the functional equation ξ(1-z)=ξ(z).
Wednesday, April 7
We discussed properties of Riemann's ζ and ξ functions, the Riemann hypothesis, and the prime number theorem.
Homework for reading day, Friday April 9: read section 10.6, pages 323-330, about elliptic functions.
Monday, April 12
We discussed the construction of the Weierstrass ℘ function.
Homework for Wednesday: Prove the duplication formula for the Weierstrass ℘ function: ℘(2z)=(1/4)(℘″(z)/℘′(z))2−2℘(z).
Wednesday, April 14
We discussed how the modular group and the congruence subgroup appear in the theory of the Weierstrass ℘ function.
Homework for Friday: Prove that D=0, where D is the determinant of the matrix whose first row is (℘(z), ℘′(z),1), whose second row is (℘(w), ℘′(w),1), and whose third row is (℘(z+w), −℘′(z+w),1).
Friday, April 16
We worked on an exercise on the Weierstrass ℘ function.
Homework for Monday: Finish that exercise (not to hand in). The two groups should start looking at the exercises on Hadamard's three-circles theorem and on Phragmén-Lindelöf theory to be presented in class next Friday.
Monday, April 19
We discussed how the mapping (℘,℘′) gives a bijection between a torus (the complex plane modulo a lattice) and an elliptic curve and how the group law on the torus induces a group law on the elliptic curve.
Homework: for Wednesday and Friday, prepare the presentations to be given in class Friday; for next Monday, read the first part of Chapter 16, pages 469-474.
Wednesday, April 21
We discussed the question of what properties of a holomorphic function defined by a power series can be recovered from the moduli of the coefficients of the series.
Friday, April 23
The groups presented the variations on the maximum principle (the three-circles theorem and Phragmén-Lindelöf theory).
Homework for Monday: Read the first part of Chapter 16, pages 469-474.
Monday, April 26
We discussed the statement of the prime number theorem and some numerical evidence for it; the Skewes number; and the three functions ζ, Φ, and ϑ that appear in the proof of the prime number theorem.
Homework for Wednesday: Read pages 475-480 in Chapter 16.
Wednesday, April 28
We continued the discussion of the proof of the prime number theorem and the way that a Tauberian theorem for the Laplace transform arises in the proof.
Homework for Friday: Finish reading Chapter 16.
Friday, April 30
We discussed Abelian and Tauberian theorems for power series and analogous theorems for Laplace transforms.
Homework for Monday: Prepare a list of statements of theorems from this semester that have appeared on past qualifying examinations. The final examination will be to state and prove a subset of those theorems.
Monday, May 3
We discussed the major theorems of the semester (to appear on the final examination).
Tuesday, May 4
This redefined day was our last class meeting. We proved Montel's theorem (using the modular function), thus completing the proof of Picard's big theorem. The lecture notes are available.